Intellectual Property | Real Estate | Technology | Software

The Eagles “No photo” Policy – give me a break.

Aug 3rd, 2017 | By | Category: Copyright Litigation

IP thought of the day – Is it legal to prohibit taking photos at a baseball game or concert?

prohibiting photos at concert or theater

Introduction

I recently attended the “Classics” concert at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles.  Two of the headline bands were Fleetwood Mac and the Eagles.  This blog concerns the Eagles “no photos” policy and whether that is legal or not.

Here’s how it went down, I scored some great tickets near center stage, VIP twelve rows back.  You could not have asked for a better seat.  When we purchased the tickets (approximately $1,700 each) we were not aware of any Eagles “no photo” policy, at least we did not recall seeing anything like that, and did not believe this formed the basis of the terms of the contract.

However, when we were seated a plethora of security started walking around the area and were telling everyone you cannot take photos of the Eagles (I suppose because you might actually get a good shot that you can keep and give to your kids one day).  So what happened is the band starts playing and next thing you know everyone is taking pictures and videotaping the show.

Now, I will concede that trying to post the video online may violate copyright laws (and maybe that’s what they are trying to prevent) but this was not clear to most people who were sitting around us which leads me to believe this was not part of the ticket purchase (contract – you pay the fee, you get the seats).  It seemed like this was an “on the spot” policy unless somehow I am mistaken.

So the Eagles are playing their great songs, and people are pulling out their iPhones and Androids left and right and taking these shots of the band up close.  Meanwhile, security is all over the place essentially going crazy harassing people to put down their phones.  They were like a swarm of bees blocking the view and carrying out this policy that was apparently created by the Eagles.

In the final analysis, it ruined a good part of the act until the photos eventually died down about half way in, resulting in a non-enjoyable first half of the concert.  To me, this is a really stingy policy of the band preventing your fans from enjoying a peaceful show without a swarm of security running around like the “fun cops.”

At any rate, my wife asked me if this would create grounds for a class action lawsuit (against either the ticket company or other), and I told her I didn’t know.  It seems like we didn’t get the true benefit of our bargain as most people expect to be able to go to a concert and snap photos of our idols.  The fun cops (thanks to the Eagles policy) prevented us from enjoying a good part of their act.  At the prices that people paid all over the stadium, it makes me wonder if this is a good policy or not.  Whether it is a breach of contract or not.

At a minimum the Eagles should re-think their policy.  For me, Fleetwood Mac (who had no photo or video prohibitions) stole the show, and definitely are more likeable as they realize music fans pay good money for not only the show, but the experience, and the ability to take their favorite photos with them. Can you image going to a baseball game and the usher telling you to put your camera down?

Here is a link dealing with Mumford and Sons.  Just so you know guys, WE ARE THE FANS AND WE PAY THESE HIGH TICKET PRICES, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO WATCH THESE SHOWS THROUGH OUR CELL PHONES IF WE WANT TO.  DON’T FORGET THE CUSTOMER.

Just my thoughts for the day.

Copyright Watchdog

The following two tabs change content below.
We are a business and civil litigation firm with a focus on copyright infringement cases involving illegal movie downloads (torrent cases such as London Has Fallen, ME2 Productions and Malibu Media defense), software audits (ex. Microsoft audits, SPLA, Autodesk audit notification letter, Siemens PLM defense, SIIA, Adobe and Business Software Alliance defense) and other software vendors threatening piracy and infringement. We also handle cases involving internet law, anti-SLAPP, media law, right of publicity, trademarks & domain name infringement, and we have a niche practice area handling California BRE licensing disputes, accusations, subpoena response, statement of issues and investigations. We have offices in San Francisco, Beverly Hills, Newport Beach, San Diego & Phoenix, Arizona and accept federal copyright and trademark cases nationwide. All content on our website is general legal information only and not a substitute for legal advice, and should not be relied upon. Decisions to hire counsel should not be based on advertising alone. Blogs, videos and podcasts are authored by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise noted. We can be reached at (877) 276-5084.

Latest posts by Vondran Legal - Civil Litigation firm handling Software audits, Copyright Infringement, Internet law, and general Business & Real Estate law (see all)

Comments are closed.