Intellectual Property | Real Estate | Technology | Software

Copyright Protection for your Site Plan, Building, Engineer Drawings and other “Architectural Works”

Apr 5th, 2016 | By | Category: Copyright Litigation

Legal Protection for Architectural Works and Designs?

Copyright infringement attorney

Introduction

Your custom-designed dream home is uniquely yours.  The site plan, architectural drawings, and structure itself may be protected from copyright infringement by other architects, contractors, or other owners.  Even in the world of real estate, copyright protections can exist for unique works of authorship that are fixed into a tangible medium, like a blueprint, unique site plan, renderings, elevations, or even Autocad designed engineering plans (ex something produced with Autocad LT or 360 software).  Basically anything that uses the intellect and creative juices that is put into a concrete form can be the subject of copyright registration. This IP blog provides some answers to some of the important questions in this unique area of law.

What is an “Architectural Work” under 17 U.S.C. §102?

In 1990, Congress passed the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act.  By doing so, it extended copyright protection to “architectural works” under 17 U.S. Code §102.   This section states:

(a) Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. Works of authorship include the following categories:

(1) literary works;

(2) musical works, including any accompanying words;

(3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music;

(4) pantomimes and choreographic works;

(5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;

(6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works;

(7) sound recordings;

and

(8) architectural works.

(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.

The law applies to buildings and other architectural works created after December 1, 1990.  While “architectural works” seems vague, Congress also defined “architectural works” to mean the “design of a building as embodied in any tangible medium of expression, including a building, architectural plans, or drawings.”

Can I get copyright protection for a site plan or even blueprints?

Yes its possible.  In fact, as long as the site plan or blue prints are original and unique, they can be afforded copyright protection by two different copyright subject matter categories.  First, per the Architectural Works category (as mentioned above), which could cover original works including site plans, models, elevations, CAD designs, blueprints, and renderings.  Second, site plans or other engineering plans can  also protected under the “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural workscategory under 17 U.S. Code §102.  As long as you can find a category to seek protection under the Act, you should consider filing for copyright protection.  For one, its cheap, and registration sets the groundwork to file an infringement lawsuit if necessary.  Registration is a pre-requisite.

Are my Architectural works unique or original enough for copyright protection?

This is a question a good copyright lawyer can help you decide.  In most cases, if you put your left brain and right brain together and came up with something that “WOWS” then usually the answer will be YES!  For example, perhaps your home is a custom home (say a beautiful high tech mansion that takes up three oversized lots).  You reduce your plans to a blue print, site plan, and have some creative renderings.  These types of documents can be protected.   Keep in mind the threshold is not super high to seek protection and we offer an affordable copyright service.

What if a similar building design (office, industrial, residential or retail) already exists?

You still may qualify for registration.  In order to determine whether the design of the building and the accompanying architectural plans are afforded copyright protection, or on the flip side, whether an architectural work infringes on a copyright owner’s original work and should be denied federal protection, the U.S. Copyright office and the federal circuit courts usually use one of two tests to determine that very question.

A.  Under the “total look and feel test”, the two works are compared by ordinary observers to determine if they are “substantially similar“.  For example, if newly constructed House “A” looked almost identical to older House “B” except for one window that was triangular instead of square,  House A might still be held to be substantially similar to House B, and may be infringing on House B’s original design.  This could also deny registration leading an applicant to file an appeal (see below)

B.  Under the “filtration” test, a court would filter out unoriginal portions of the work before comparing the original/unique portions of the separate works to find out if they are substantially similar.  So for example, parts of a building or residence that relate to form or function (ex. rain gutters) might be stripped away in comparing the two properties to see if they are too closely related.

What happens if your filing for protection is rejected by the U.S. Copyright Office?

You can always file an appeal.  As it notes on the government website Copyright.gov:

Appeals of Denial of Registration – Under title 17, the Register of Copyrights may determine that the material deposited for copyright registration does not constitute copyrightable subject matter or that the claim is invalid for other reasons. In such cases, the Register refuses registration and notifies the applicant in writing of the reason(s) for such refusal. Applicants whose claims for registration are rejected can appeal such decisions in a two-stage process. The first appeal is made to the Examining Division. If the Division upholds the refusal, a second appeal may be made to the Copyright Office Board of Appeals, consisting of the Register of Copyrights, the General Counsel, and the Chief of the Examining Division.

Our intellectual property law firm can help you respond to a denial or rejection of your application.  Call us at at the number above for more information or to speak with an IP attorney.

Why are the benefits of registering a copyright for my building?

As mentioned above, you need to register your copyright before you can file a suit alleging innocent or willful copyright infringement.  Either way, you can seek damages from $30,000 to $150,000.  See our video below that discusses damages.

Registering a copyright for your custom or original building design or plans also offers the opportunity for attorneys’ fees, and court costs.  Statutory damages means that the court can award a set amount in damages rather than requiring the copyright owner to prove the actual damages suffered (which sometimes is not as easy as it sounds).  These enhanced remedies are available if you register your building with the United States Copyright Office before the infringement is commenced by the infringer.  If you are seeking to register a copyright for an architectural work including site plans, note also that you must register within three months of the first publication of the architectural work.  This is a very important fact to keep in mind.

Overview of damages available to Plaintiff’s in a copyright lawsuit

protect building design plans

VIDEO:  Click on the picture above to watch our video.  Make sure to click on the RED “V” for Victory to subscribe to our Youtube channel.  We are approaching a quarter of a million hits to our legal channel and we thank you all for your continued support.

Can a unique building “trade dress” be copyrighted (the outside appearance of a business or building)?

Trade dress” is the look and feel of a product that is identifiable by consumers and distinguishes it from others.  A classic example of trade dress is the iconic Coca-Cola bottle shape.  Even without its’ labeling, most consumers associate the bottle shape with Coca-Cola.  The trade dress of a building refers to the architectural design of the exterior or interior of a building (ex. everybody knows what KFC looks like the minute they see the building).

Generally, trade dress is attained over a period of time as it takes time for the design to achieve identifiable status in the minds of consumers and in the marketplace (i.e. a “secondary meaning”).  Once consumers begin to associate your building’s distinctive architectural design with you or the building itself, trade dress has been acquired, and it may be possible to obtain copyright protection for the look and feel of the exterior of the building.  These designs can also be generated by computer software programs that can aid in the design such as Adobe photoshop as this excellent article on “composite a 3D building into a photo.”  It is recommended to take the additional step and register trade dress with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), to obtain additional advantages under the trademark laws.

Can I stop someone from commercializing a photo of my historic building without them paying me a licensing fee?

Generally, no.  However, there are a few exceptions and one time I was asked to stop taking photos outside an historic building (to my surprise). I was actually asked to file an application with the City to pay a fee for the privilege of taking my photo with the building.  So it can and does happen. I am assuming if I kept shooting photos I would have been escorted off the property.

Keep in mind, the law generally does not apply to buildings built before December 1, 1990, so if someone took a picture of a building you own that was built in 1989, you will have a much more difficult time trying to stop them from taking photos, creating a painting, or otherwise commercializing the building or structure.

Also, if your building (built after Dec. 1, 1990) is viewable from a public place, you as the owner, architect, contractor, or developer, will likewise have difficulty preventing others from commercializing a photo or painting of your building.  If you want to know if there are any exceptions to the general rule, contact us to discuss.

However, if someone enters private property without permission to take a photo of your building (built after Dec. 1, 1990), in addition to them being a possible trespasser, you may be able to allege copyright infringement if they attempted to commercialize your copyrighted works by creating a substantially similar copy (keep in mind there are defenses for parody, fair use, and “transformative” uses that may also come into play).

The same rules and exceptions generally apply for interior architectural works (for example, your building’s distinctive lobby design) as well.  If the interior of your building is not publicly viewable, you may be able to prevent someone from commercializing a photograph of the interior of your building or otherwise copyright unique and protected elements if:

  • The interior is sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection (ex. the inside of a building may contain an old courthouse);
  • The elements are not “functional elements whose design or placement is dictated by utilitarian concerns”(ex. atriums, arches and ceilings that are novel); and

Even if you cannot satisfy these elements, you still may be able to prevent them from commercializing the photo or painting if there were other contractual or privacy related issues (ex. breaching a contract such as a ticket to enter) or invading privacy.

If you still believe you cannot stop them from commercializing a photo or painting of your unique building or exterior, look a little bit closer at the photo.  If the photo or painting contains a “separable” work of art – like a garden sculpture, newer statues, or murals — these may also be protected under general copyright laws that protect artists, and creators, and if they are memorialized within the photo, it may constitute copyright infringement if the items were registered.  It always makes sense to provide a warning sign or notice to the public that taking pictures or making other illegal copies may be illegal.  I saw this once in an antique shop that had original birdhouses for sale.

For more information

A. Here is an interesting list of properties and various objects that may cause issues if photographed and made available for commercialization.

B.  Article on IP protection for engineering plans

Contact a Copyright Protection Law Firm

We have vast experience in the area of federal copyright law and software compliance audits.  We can help you ensure your architectural designs and building blueprints are protected, and can help you as a Plaintiff if you believe that your designs or architecture has been wrongfully copied and we represent Defendants being bullied or faced with a civil suit over any type of copyrighted work including music, books, lyrics, art, photographs, videos, film and other creative products.  We can be reached at (877) 276-5084.  We offer free initial consultations and “flat rate” legal fees for some, but not all cases.  When it comes to intellectual property, there is simply no substitute for passion or experience.  We offer both.

 

 

 

The following two tabs change content below.
We are a business and civil litigation firm with a focus on copyright infringement cases involving illegal movie downloads (torrent cases such as London Has Fallen, ME2 Productions and Malibu Media defense), software audits (ex. Microsoft audits, SPLA, Autodesk audit notification letter, Siemens PLM defense, SIIA, Adobe and Business Software Alliance defense) and other software vendors threatening piracy and infringement. We also handle cases involving internet law, anti-SLAPP, media law, right of publicity, trademarks & domain name infringement, and we have a niche practice area handling California BRE licensing disputes, accusations, subpoena response, statement of issues and investigations. We have offices in San Francisco, Beverly Hills, Newport Beach, San Diego & Phoenix, Arizona and accept federal copyright and trademark cases nationwide. All content on our website is general legal information only and not a substitute for legal advice, and should not be relied upon. Decisions to hire counsel should not be based on advertising alone. Blogs, videos and podcasts are authored by Steve Vondran, Esq. unless otherwise noted. We can be reached at (877) 276-5084.

Latest posts by Vondran Legal - Civil Litigation firm handling Software audits, Copyright Infringement, Internet law, and general Business & Real Estate law (see all)

Comments are closed.